PUTRAJAYA, Oct 26 — The Federal Court today acquitted and discharged three friends, including one woman, on the charge of murdering a man whose body has yet to be found.
A three-judge panel chaired by Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat ordered the release of Mohd Zulhiami Md Darus, 37, Siti Nor Asiah Abdul Wahab, 32, and Muhammad Rahmat Nazarudin, 29, after allowing their appeal against a decision by the Shah Alam High Court on October 24, 2019, in sentencing them to death for the murder.
In the summary judgment, Tengku Maimum said the appellants raised several issues, and the court found the main issue was whether the appellants were denied the right to a fair trial.
“After hearing the lawyers’ submissions for the appellants and the prosecutor, as well as examining the grounds of the judgment and the appeal record, we are satisfied the entire trial was conducted in a manner which did not comply with the law.
“This prejudiced the appellants and resulted in their unsafe conviction. Therefore, we allow the appeal by the three. The order of the High Court judge, confirmed by the Court of Appeal, is set aside, and the three appellants are acquitted and discharged (of the murder charge),” said the judge, who sat with Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah and Judge Datuk Abu Bakar Jais.
After the court gave the decision, Mohd Zulhiami and Muhammad Rahmat were seen hugging each other, while Siti Nor Asiah was in tears.
The three friends were appealing against the decision of the Court of Appeal on April 14, 2022, which upheld the conviction and death sentence meted out by the Shah Alam High Court on October 24, 2019.
Mohd Zulhiami and Siti Nor Asiah were initially charged under Section 109 of the Penal Code with conspiring with Muhammad Rahmat to kill Mohammad Fairul Haqiemi, 21, at an apartment along Jalan Dato Yusof Shahbudin 3 Taman Sentosa, Klang, between 12.30am and 1am on August 29, 2016.
Muhammad Rahmat was charged with killing Mohammad Fairul Haqiemie at 4am at the same location and under Section 302 of the Penal Code.
However, the charge was amended at the end of the prosecution case with the time of the incident for the charge of murder and conspiracy to murder at 4am and the date changed to August 30, 2016.
Earlier, lawyer Kitson Foong, representing Mohd Zulhiami, submitted that the defence only found out about the amendment of the date and time of the incident in the charge after examining the appeal records.
“The High Court’s trial judge made the amendment after allowing the prosecution’s application without any notification. The lawyers were not informed of the amendment, and the three accused also did not know about it.
“If an amendment is made, the charge should be reread to the client, and the plea should be recorded, and they can call witnesses for the defence,” he said.
Lawyer Datuk Geethan Ram Vincent, representing Siti Nor Asiah, said the trial judge (High Court) had erred in terms of facts and law when he failed to consider the prosecution’s main witness, Zairul Noraidi Shahidin, was an accomplice, The matter was acknowledged by Muhammad Rahmat’s lawyer, Fahri Azzat.
Deputy public prosecutors Parvin Hameedah Mohd Khaja and Aida Khairuleen Azli appeared for the prosecution.
— Bernama
