Selangor Journal
A Court of Appeal chamber in the Palace of Justice, Putrajaya. — Picture by BERNAMA

Appeals court dismisses lawyer’s bid to challenge imposition of departure levy

PUTRAJAYA, March 14 — A lawyer lost his appeal in the Court of Appeal today to challenge the imposition of a departure levy on Malaysians travelling overseas.

A three-member bench comprising Justices Datuk Yaacob Md Sam, Datuk Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali and Datuk Azman Abdullah dismissed R. Kengadharan’s appeal with no order as to costs.

Justice Azman, who delivered the court’s unanimous decision held that Kengadharan’s appeal did not have merits that warranted appellate intervention.

He said the case law in the Government of Malaysia vs Loh Wai Kong where the Federal Court ruled that the right to travel abroad is not absolute, is valid and applicable to this case.

In the 1979 case, the Federal Court dismissed Loh’s application for a declaration that Malaysian citizens had a fundamental right under Article Five of the Federal Constitution to travel overseas.

In the court proceeding conducted online today, Justice Yaacob as well as Kengadharan’s lawyer A. Srimurugan expressed their condolences to the family of the late former Federal Court judge Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram, who passed away recently.

Sri Ram was the counsel for Kengadharan when the appeal was heard on January 4, this year. He argued that Loh Wai Kong’s case was wrongly decided and that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right.

Kengadharan was appealing against the High Court’s decision on February 27, 2020, to dismiss his suit which he had named the Finance Minister and the government as respondents.

In his originating summons filed in August 2019, Kengadharan sought a declaration that the Departure Levy Act 2019 and the Departure Levy Order 2019 were in breach of his fundamental right to travel.

He had sought a declaration that the orders breach Article 5 (1) of the Federal Constitution and cannot be enforced.

In his affidavit to support the suit, Kengadharan said any form of tax imposed, including on those who wish to go on a pilgrimage or to perform the haj, was a violation of fundamental liberties.

Kengadharan also said any imposition of a departure tax, in addition to the existing service and airport taxes, would be burdensome and harsh.

The departure levy was imposed by the then-Pakatan Harapan government in 2019.

In today’s proceedings, lawyer Dr Shamsher Singh Thind also represented Kengadharan while federal counsel V. Krishna Priya appeared for Finance Minister and the Government.

— Bernama

Top Picks

Malaysia calls for restraint, probe into Gaza crisis at UN Security Council

MACC focuses on enhancing governance, integrity to revive country’s economy

MOH stands by decision to amend Medical Act — Dr Dzul